Tourist First

Travel notes and advice from around the world. Above, the daily flight from Managua at the San Carlos, Nicaragua, airstrip.

Thursday, August 25, 2011

Virginia is for ... what, exactly?

I'm not a huge fan of Virginia. Sure, it has some pretty scenery. That's a vineyard at Barboursville, right, about two hours from Washington, D.C. And there are loads of charming small towns, good restaurants and beautiful drives. Both Washington's Mount Vernon and Jefferson's Monticello are in Virginia.
What I don't like about Virginia is its political climate. It's one of the states that is suing to prevent implementation of the Affordable Care Act, better known as Obama's health reform bill. The current governor and attorney general have also done everything they can to knock down anti-discrimination policies that benefited gay people. Overall, it's a state that in some ways seems determined to return to the 1950s if not the 1930s.
That said, not everyone there is politically regressive. The state went for Obama in 2008 and given rising voter remorse about electing so many Republicans in 2010, there's a chance it will stay blue in 2012. I don't think visiting Virginia is on a level with taking a golf vacation to Haiti during the Duvalier regimes.
If you're a lover, Virginia may well be for you after all. Here are a couple of the state tourism board's web sites. CLICK HERE for wine travel; CLICK HERE for autumn travel ideas.

3 comments:

  1. Keep ur politics to yourself.

    ReplyDelete
  2. There's nothing wrong with considering the politics of the places you go. Who'd want to go to Iran even if it was safe for Americans? Who'd want to support the North Korean government by spending travel dollars there? He's right that Virginia went for Obama once and I think it will again. I have no problems going to Virginia. In fact, I live there.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm with you. Many of the elected politicians - in particular the governor and attorney general -- want the state to return woman's health care to the 50's and limit free speech. You forgot to mention that (1) the governor is responsible for the Republican Party platform that says they want to make all abortions illegal regardless of rape or incest or the mother's health; (2) the attorney general sued a professor for his research on global warming; (3) the governor's failed attempt to pass legislation to require invasive ultra sounds prior to abortions; and (4) the new building code the governor got passed that effectively will shut down existing abortion clinics (and then he over-ruled his own staff who said it should not apply to existing buildings).

    ReplyDelete